{"id":34121,"date":"2026-08-22T09:00:00","date_gmt":"2026-08-22T07:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/?p=34121"},"modified":"2026-10-16T09:20:41","modified_gmt":"2026-10-16T07:20:41","slug":"sudakov-ai-recommendation-filters-out-good-ideas","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/en\/sudakov-ai-recommendation-filters-out-good-ideas\/","title":{"rendered":"Sudakov: AI recommendations filter out good ideas"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"display:inline-block;background:#d65663;color:#fff;padding:4px 14px;border-radius:20px;font-size:0.85em;margin-bottom:18px;\">5 min read<\/p>\n<p><strong>Whoever judges first in a selection round frames everyone else&#8217;s thinking. In the Harvard Business Review field experiment, a language model judged first. 228 experienced evaluators followed.<\/strong><\/p>\n<div style=\"background:#f6f1e6;border-left:4px solid #d65663;border-radius:0 8px 8px 0;padding:22px 26px;margin:28px 0 34px;\">\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 14px 0;font-size:0.76em;font-weight:700;text-transform:uppercase;letter-spacing:0.16em;color:#c0414e;\">Key takeaways<\/p>\n<ul style=\"margin:0;padding-left:22px;color:#23303f;line-height:1.6;\">\n<li style=\"margin-bottom:12px;\"><strong style=\"color:#c0414e;\">A machine&#8217;s rejection sways the group.<\/strong> 228 evaluators followed its rejection even when four experts wanted to keep the idea.<\/li>\n<li style=\"margin-bottom:12px;\"><strong style=\"color:#c0414e;\">Sequence matters.<\/strong> When the recommendation comes first, the group must argue against the machine.<\/li>\n<li style=\"margin-bottom:12px;\"><strong style=\"color:#c0414e;\">Rejections need a named owner.<\/strong> High-stakes decisions get human judgment first. Rejected cases face later review.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<p style=\"font-size:0.88em;color:#666;margin:20px 0 32px 0;border-top:1px solid #e5e5e5;border-bottom:1px solid #e5e5e5;padding:10px 0;\"><span style=\"color:#0a1e3d;font-weight:700;text-transform:uppercase;font-size:0.72em;letter-spacing:0.14em;margin-right:14px;\">Related<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/en\/genai-erodes-critical-thinking-why-half-of-all-organizations-plan-ai-free-assess\/\" style=\"color:#333;text-decoration:underline;\">Critical thinking: AI challenges for leaders<\/a>&nbsp;&nbsp;<span style=\"color:#ccc;\">\/<\/span>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/en\/which-control-remains-after-the-agent-rollout\/\" style=\"color:#333;text-decoration:underline;\">What governance remains after the agent rollout<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-top:32px;\"><strong>What does this mean for a selection round?<\/strong> The experiment compared three approaches and shows where the group abandons its own judgment.<\/p>\n<h2 style=\"margin-top:32px;margin-bottom:16px;\">228 evaluators, three approaches, one benchmark<\/h2>\n<p>Writing in Harvard Business Review on 19 August, Leonid Sudakov and Nathan Furr describe a field experiment assessing early-stage ideas. Their finding: the machine&#8217;s recommendation shifts judgment before people have assessed ideas independently. The setting was a real selection process.<\/p>\n<p>228 experienced evaluators reviewed 48 actual submissions to a global MIT social impact competition. Three approaches competed: humans alone; recommendations from a large language model with narrative explanations; the same recommendations without further context. Four experts associated with the competition provided the benchmark.<\/p>\n<div data-element=\"comparison_table\" style=\"overflow-x:auto;-webkit-overflow-scrolling:touch;margin:16px 0 32px 0;\">\n<table style=\"width:100%;min-width:560px;border-collapse:collapse;font-size:0.95em;\">\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th style=\"padding:12px 16px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #d65663;background:#f6f1e6;color:#0d1b2a;\">Approach<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:12px 16px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #d65663;background:#f6f1e6;color:#0d1b2a;\">What the group sees<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:12px 16px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #d65663;background:#f6f1e6;color:#0d1b2a;\">What this means for the group<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:10px 16px;border:1px solid #ddd;background:#fff;\">Humans alone<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px 16px;border:1px solid #ddd;background:#fff;\">The submission without an automated preliminary decision<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px 16px;border:1px solid #ddd;background:#fff;\">Slower, but with independent reasoning<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:10px 16px;border:1px solid #ddd;background:#f6f1e6;\">Model without context<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px 16px;border:1px solid #ddd;background:#f6f1e6;\">A bare recommendation without a narrative explanation<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px 16px;border:1px solid #ddd;background:#f6f1e6;\">Rapid acceptance, little dissent<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:10px 16px;border:1px solid #ddd;background:#fff;\">Model plus narrative<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px 16px;border:1px solid #ddd;background:#fff;\">The same recommendation with a polished story<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px 16px;border:1px solid #ddd;background:#fff;\">Agreement may increase because the story persuades<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<p>The underlying research appears in the Harvard Business School (HBS) working paper <em>The Narrative AI Advantage?<\/em> by J. N. Lane and co-authors. The researchers describe the same three approaches: human assessment, recommendations without explanations, and recommendations plus narrative. HBR draws out the leadership question. The implications determine the sequence for the next round.<\/p>\n<h2 style=\"margin-top:32px;margin-bottom:16px;\">Rejection has more influence than approval<\/h2>\n<p>The tool encouraged evaluators to reject submissions the expert panel approved. People largely followed. Promising projects fell through the filter.<\/p>\n<p>The finding extends beyond innovation labs. The same mechanism operates in investment committees, product committees, supplier selection and internal investment rounds. A model that sounds fast and confident lowers the threshold for rejection. Dissent requires a better argument than the machine&#8217;s and usually more time than the meeting allows.<\/p>\n<p>That makes sequence crucial. When the machine&#8217;s recommendation comes first, the group searches for reasons to challenge the machine&#8217;s judgment. The decision comes before anyone opens the figures.<\/p>\n<h2 style=\"margin-top:32px;margin-bottom:16px;\">BCG describes the same effect as lock-in<\/h2>\n<p>Boston Consulting Group (BCG) published a related finding in early August. It was a separate study. When rules, decision processes and operational knowledge become embedded in a model stack, cognitive lock-in develops. The organization believes it still makes decisions, yet does so within an architecture it does not fully control.<\/p>\n<p>BCG identifies signs visible without examining the technology. Teams stop explaining why because they follow the model&#8217;s reasoning. Business units complain that the tool misses their actual needs. And strategy bends around what the model does well.<\/p>\n<p>The HBR experiment makes the same point measurable. The narrative version influences evaluators at least as strongly as the recommendation without explanation. A polished story can even increase reliance.<\/p>\n<h2 style=\"margin-top:32px;margin-bottom:16px;\">Who owns the rejected idea?<\/h2>\n<p>In Germany and the European Union (EU), responsibility remains with the individual and the company. Since early August, the AI Act has required transparency for certain systems. It does not make selection decisions for anyone. A log entry reading \u201cModel rejected\u201d provides no defensible justification before regulators, a works council or in the event of subsequent harm.<\/p>\n<p>Once assessments affect careers, sites or major investments, employee participation becomes mandatory. The works council must know which criteria the tool considers, which it skips and who can still halt an automated rejection. Otherwise, the dispute surfaces in later proceedings. By then, the group has already lost ideas.<\/p>\n<p>The rule is broad and robust. Low-stakes decisions can use automated screening; high-stakes decisions get human judgment first. The machine contributes a second opinion or a challenge. Every approval and rejection has a named owner responsible for reviewing rejected cases later.<\/p>\n<h2 style=\"margin-top:32px;margin-bottom:16px;\">Three questions for the next round<\/h2>\n<p>Three questions turn the finding into an agenda item. First: does the group see the idea before the machine&#8217;s recommendation appears? Second: can someone vote against it without losing face? Is that recorded in the minutes? Third: does an independent reviewer check a sample of rejections, as the experiment&#8217;s expert panel did?<\/p>\n<p>If any question remains unanswered, the process lacks oversight. Sudakov and Furr insist that independent judgment must remain strong enough to overrule a persuasive system. That sounds soft. It becomes hard-edged once budgets, liability and a pipeline of internal bets depend on it.<\/p>\n<p>The question for the next discussion among peers: is a list of recently rejected proposals available, showing which rejections originated with the model? Without that list, recommendations are already in control. Nobody decided to make it so.<\/p>\n<h2 style=\"margin-top:32px;margin-bottom:16px;\">Frequently asked questions<\/h2>\n<details style=\"background:#f9f9f9;padding:16px 20px;margin:12px 0;border-radius:4px;\">\n<summary style=\"font-weight:700;cursor:pointer;color:#1a1a2e;\"><strong>Can a model make the initial rejection?<\/strong><\/summary>\n<p style=\"margin:12px 0 0 0;\">Yes, for low-stakes screening. For investments, staffing and strategic bets, human judgment comes first; the model then provides a challenge.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n<details style=\"background:#f9f9f9;padding:16px 20px;margin:12px 0;border-radius:4px;\">\n<summary style=\"font-weight:700;cursor:pointer;color:#1a1a2e;\"><strong>Is the model&#8217;s explanation sufficient documentary proof?<\/strong><\/summary>\n<p style=\"margin:12px 0 0 0;\">No. The narrative explains how the system reasons. It replaces neither personal sign-off nor subsequent review of rejections.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n<details style=\"background:#f9f9f9;padding:16px 20px;margin:12px 0;border-radius:4px;\">\n<summary style=\"font-weight:700;cursor:pointer;color:#1a1a2e;\"><strong>How does the AI Act affect this process?<\/strong><\/summary>\n<p style=\"margin:12px 0 0 0;\">It requires transparency for certain systems. Selection and liability remain with the individual and company. A log entry alone cannot justify approval.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n<details style=\"background:#f9f9f9;padding:16px 20px;margin:12px 0;border-radius:4px;\">\n<summary style=\"font-weight:700;cursor:pointer;color:#1a1a2e;\"><strong>When must the works council be involved?<\/strong><\/summary>\n<p style=\"margin:12px 0 0 0;\">As soon as assessments affect careers, sites or major staffing decisions. Criteria, the right to challenge decisions and sample reviews belong in the agreement.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n<details style=\"background:#f9f9f9;padding:16px 20px;margin:12px 0;border-radius:4px;\">\n<summary style=\"font-weight:700;cursor:pointer;color:#1a1a2e;\"><strong>Which first step makes the biggest difference?<\/strong><\/summary>\n<p style=\"margin:12px 0 0 0;\">In the next round, show the machine&#8217;s recommendation only after the initial human vote and assign every rejection to a named owner.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 12px 0;font-size:0.78em;font-weight:700;text-transform:uppercase;letter-spacing:0.18em;color:#666;\">More from the MBF Media Network<\/p>\n<div style=\"padding:14px 18px;border-left:3px solid #0bb7fd;background:#fafafa;margin-bottom:6px;\">\n<div style=\"font-size:0.7em;font-weight:700;color:#0bb7fd;text-transform:uppercase;letter-spacing:0.12em;margin-bottom:4px;\">cloudmagazin<\/div>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.cloudmagazin.com\/2026\/08\/18\/lieferkette-der-operative-datenpfad-bricht-zuerst\/\" style=\"font-weight:600;line-height:1.4;color:#1a1a1a;text-decoration:none;\">Supply chain breaks at the data path between MES and ERP<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"padding:14px 18px;border-left:3px solid #202528;background:#fafafa;margin-bottom:6px;\">\n<div style=\"font-size:0.7em;font-weight:700;color:#202528;text-transform:uppercase;letter-spacing:0.12em;margin-bottom:4px;\">mybusinessfuture<\/div>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/mybusinessfuture.com\/ki-erfolg-ohne-experte-wer-verantwortet\/\" style=\"font-weight:600;line-height:1.4;color:#1a1a1a;text-decoration:none;\">AI success without an expert: Who owns the outcome<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"padding:14px 18px;border-left:3px solid #69d8ed;background:#fafafa;\">\n<div style=\"font-size:0.7em;font-weight:700;color:#69d8ed;text-transform:uppercase;letter-spacing:0.12em;margin-bottom:4px;\">securitytoday<\/div>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.securitytoday.de\/2026\/08\/14\/offener-code-x-europas-nachweispflicht\/\" style=\"font-weight:600;line-height:1.4;color:#1a1a1a;text-decoration:none;\">X&#8217;s open code does not remove Europe&#8217;s documentary proof requirement<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p style=\"text-align:right;color:#868e96;font-size:0.75em;margin-top:40px;\"><em>Image source: AI-generated (August 2026)<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>An MIT competition, three review methods, one expert panel. When the model said no, experienced judges dropped ideas the panel wanted to keep.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":47,"featured_media":34041,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_yoast_wpseo_focuskw":"independent judgment","_yoast_wpseo_title":"Sudakov: AI recommendations filter out good ideas","_yoast_wpseo_metadesc":"HBR field experiment: 228 evaluators followed AI rejections even when experts wanted to keep an idea. The final sign-off stays human.","_yoast_wpseo_opengraph-image":"","_yoast_wpseo_opengraph-image-id":0,"_yoast_wpseo_twitter-image":"","_yoast_wpseo_twitter-image-id":0,"featured_post_sortierung":0,"featured_post":0,"pre_headline":"","bildquelle":"","teasertext":"","language":"de","_evm_slot_owner":"","_evm_translation_lang":"","_wp_old_slug":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[712],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-34121","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-ai-data","entry"],"wpml_language":"en","wpml_translation_of":34031,"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.1.1 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sudakov: AI recommendations filter out good ideas<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"HBR field experiment: 228 evaluators followed AI rejections even when experts wanted to keep an idea. The final sign-off stays human.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/en\/sudakov-ai-recommendation-filters-out-good-ideas\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sudakov: AI recommendations filter out good ideas\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"HBR field experiment: 228 evaluators followed AI rejections even when experts wanted to keep an idea. The final sign-off stays human.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/en\/sudakov-ai-recommendation-filters-out-good-ideas\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Digital Chiefs\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/digitalchiefs\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-08-22T07:00:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-10-16T07:20:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/harvard-ki-urteil-sortiert-innovation-aus-cover-hero-1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1280\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"720\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bernhard Liebl\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@digital_chiefs\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@digital_chiefs\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bernhard Liebl\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"NewsArticle\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/en\/sudakov-ai-recommendation-filters-out-good-ideas\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/en\/sudakov-ai-recommendation-filters-out-good-ideas\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Bernhard Liebl\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/6420de0b227b38e6859e2347ff5ed9ee\"},\"headline\":\"Sudakov: AI recommendations filter out good ideas\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-08-22T07:00:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-10-16T07:20:41+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/en\/sudakov-ai-recommendation-filters-out-good-ideas\/\"},\"wordCount\":1036,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/en\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/en\/sudakov-ai-recommendation-filters-out-good-ideas\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/harvard-ki-urteil-sortiert-innovation-aus-cover-hero-1.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"AI &amp; Data\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/en\/sudakov-ai-recommendation-filters-out-good-ideas\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/en\/sudakov-ai-recommendation-filters-out-good-ideas\/\",\"name\":\"Sudakov: AI recommendations filter out good ideas\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/en\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/en\/sudakov-ai-recommendation-filters-out-good-ideas\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/en\/sudakov-ai-recommendation-filters-out-good-ideas\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/harvard-ki-urteil-sortiert-innovation-aus-cover-hero-1.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-08-22T07:00:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-10-16T07:20:41+00:00\",\"description\":\"HBR field experiment: 228 evaluators followed AI rejections even when experts wanted to keep an idea. The final sign-off stays human.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/en\/sudakov-ai-recommendation-filters-out-good-ideas\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/en\/sudakov-ai-recommendation-filters-out-good-ideas\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/en\/sudakov-ai-recommendation-filters-out-good-ideas\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/harvard-ki-urteil-sortiert-innovation-aus-cover-hero-1.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/harvard-ki-urteil-sortiert-innovation-aus-cover-hero-1.jpg\",\"width\":1280,\"height\":720,\"caption\":\"Bildquelle: KI-generiert (August 2026)\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/en\/sudakov-ai-recommendation-filters-out-good-ideas\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Startseite\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/en\/home\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sudakov: AI recommendations filter out good ideas\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/en\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/en\/\",\"name\":\"Digital Chiefs\",\"description\":\"Architekten des digitalen Deutschlands\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/en\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/en\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/en\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Digital Chiefs\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/en\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/cropped-digital-chiefs-logo-klein.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/cropped-digital-chiefs-logo-klein.jpg\",\"width\":190,\"height\":190,\"caption\":\"Digital Chiefs\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/digitalchiefs\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/digital_chiefs\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/digital-chiefs\/\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/6420de0b227b38e6859e2347ff5ed9ee\",\"name\":\"Bernhard Liebl\",\"description\":\"Bernhard Liebl is an author and Co-Founder & CEO of planeed, a SaaS platform for Semantic Brand Architecture. He addresses the question of how brand knowledge can be structured, linked and made understandable and retrievable for search and AI systems. Drawing on his many years of experience in digital strategy and marketing, he writes for Digital Chiefs about AI Visibility, Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) and the question of which structural decisions support digital brand management in AI systems.\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/en\/author\/bernhard-liebl\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sudakov: AI recommendations filter out good ideas","description":"HBR field experiment: 228 evaluators followed AI rejections even when experts wanted to keep an idea. The final sign-off stays human.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/en\/sudakov-ai-recommendation-filters-out-good-ideas\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sudakov: AI recommendations filter out good ideas","og_description":"HBR field experiment: 228 evaluators followed AI rejections even when experts wanted to keep an idea. The final sign-off stays human.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/en\/sudakov-ai-recommendation-filters-out-good-ideas\/","og_site_name":"Digital Chiefs","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/digitalchiefs\/","article_published_time":"2026-08-22T07:00:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-10-16T07:20:41+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1280,"height":720,"url":"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/harvard-ki-urteil-sortiert-innovation-aus-cover-hero-1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bernhard Liebl","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@digital_chiefs","twitter_site":"@digital_chiefs","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bernhard Liebl","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/en\/sudakov-ai-recommendation-filters-out-good-ideas\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/en\/sudakov-ai-recommendation-filters-out-good-ideas\/"},"author":{"name":"Bernhard Liebl","@id":"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/6420de0b227b38e6859e2347ff5ed9ee"},"headline":"Sudakov: AI recommendations filter out good ideas","datePublished":"2026-08-22T07:00:00+00:00","dateModified":"2026-10-16T07:20:41+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/en\/sudakov-ai-recommendation-filters-out-good-ideas\/"},"wordCount":1036,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/en\/sudakov-ai-recommendation-filters-out-good-ideas\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/harvard-ki-urteil-sortiert-innovation-aus-cover-hero-1.jpg","articleSection":["AI &amp; Data"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/en\/sudakov-ai-recommendation-filters-out-good-ideas\/","url":"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/en\/sudakov-ai-recommendation-filters-out-good-ideas\/","name":"Sudakov: AI recommendations filter out good ideas","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/en\/sudakov-ai-recommendation-filters-out-good-ideas\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/en\/sudakov-ai-recommendation-filters-out-good-ideas\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/harvard-ki-urteil-sortiert-innovation-aus-cover-hero-1.jpg","datePublished":"2026-08-22T07:00:00+00:00","dateModified":"2026-10-16T07:20:41+00:00","description":"HBR field experiment: 228 evaluators followed AI rejections even when experts wanted to keep an idea. The final sign-off stays human.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/en\/sudakov-ai-recommendation-filters-out-good-ideas\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/en\/sudakov-ai-recommendation-filters-out-good-ideas\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/en\/sudakov-ai-recommendation-filters-out-good-ideas\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/harvard-ki-urteil-sortiert-innovation-aus-cover-hero-1.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/harvard-ki-urteil-sortiert-innovation-aus-cover-hero-1.jpg","width":1280,"height":720,"caption":"Bildquelle: KI-generiert (August 2026)"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/en\/sudakov-ai-recommendation-filters-out-good-ideas\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Startseite","item":"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/en\/home\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sudakov: AI recommendations filter out good ideas"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/en\/","name":"Digital Chiefs","description":"Architekten des digitalen Deutschlands","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/en\/#organization","name":"Digital Chiefs","url":"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/cropped-digital-chiefs-logo-klein.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/cropped-digital-chiefs-logo-klein.jpg","width":190,"height":190,"caption":"Digital Chiefs"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/digitalchiefs\/","https:\/\/x.com\/digital_chiefs","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/digital-chiefs\/"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/6420de0b227b38e6859e2347ff5ed9ee","name":"Bernhard Liebl","description":"Bernhard Liebl is an author and Co-Founder & CEO of planeed, a SaaS platform for Semantic Brand Architecture. He addresses the question of how brand knowledge can be structured, linked and made understandable and retrievable for search and AI systems. Drawing on his many years of experience in digital strategy and marketing, he writes for Digital Chiefs about AI Visibility, Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) and the question of which structural decisions support digital brand management in AI systems.","url":"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/en\/author\/bernhard-liebl\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34121","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/47"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=34121"}],"version-history":[{"count":9,"href":"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34121\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":35778,"href":"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34121\/revisions\/35778"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/34041"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=34121"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=34121"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=34121"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}