01.03.2026
4 min read

The World Economic Forum forecasts that 39 percent of all professional competencies will become obsolete by 2030. Germany faces a shortfall of 109,000 IT professionals. CIOs now confront a strategic, make-or-break decision: buy talent at premium prices – or systematically upskill their existing workforce? The answer determines whether the IT organization remains operationally capable in three years – or collapses under skill gaps.

TL;DR

  • 📊 39% of skills will become obsolete: The WEF Future of Jobs Report predicts that 39 percent of all core professional competencies will be transformed by 2030.
  • 🇩🇪 109,000 open IT positions: Bitkom estimates Germany’s IT skills gap at 109,000 unfilled roles. AI specialists are the hardest-to-fill profiles.
  • 💰 Reskilling is cheaper than hiring: McKinsey estimates internal reskilling costs at just 30-50 percent of the total cost of a new hire – including onboarding, turnover, and time-to-productivity.
  • 🤖 AI as a skill multiplier: AI copilots can boost developer productivity by 20-40 percent – and double as implicit, on-the-job training tools.
  • 🎯 Three action areas: AI literacy for all employees; specialized upskilling for critical roles; and strategic hiring only for competencies impossible to build internally.

The Perfect Storm: Skill Erosion Meets Talent Shortage

CIOs are caught in a dual squeeze. On one side, existing IT competencies are becoming obsolete faster than ever before. Cloud-native architectures, AI engineering, DevSecOps, FinOps – the skill requirements have shifted more dramatically in three years than in the entire prior decade. On the other, competition for IT talent is intensifying. Bitkom puts Germany’s IT vacancy count at 109,000 open positions. Filling AI specialist roles takes 6 to 12 months.

The WEF Future of Jobs Report forecasts that 39 percent of all core professional competencies will be transformed by 2030. In IT, the shift is even steeper: manual infrastructure work is being replaced by Infrastructure-as-Code; traditional testing, by AI-generated test suites; and routine coding, by AI copilots. Skills in demand in 2020 are already partially obsolete in 2026.

CIOs thus face a strategic, foundational question: Do I try to buy missing competencies on the open market – competing head-to-head with every other company for the same scarce talent? Or do I invest in systematically upskilling my current workforce – and build capabilities from within? McKinsey estimates that internal reskilling costs 30-50 percent less than an equivalent new hire when factoring in onboarding, turnover, and time-to-productivity.

“AI competence has become a key qualification. Fifty-three percent of companies cite lack of expertise as the central barrier to AI adoption.”
Bitkom, “Artificial Intelligence in Germany 2026” (2025/2026, n=604)

Which IT Skills Will Lose Value by 2026

Not all skills erode at the same pace. CIOs must differentiate between competencies facing declining demand, stable demand, and sharply rising demand.

Declining demand: Traditional on-premises system administration; manual testing; basic COBOL and RPG programming; first-level support (increasingly handled by AI chatbots); manual data preparation and reporting. These roles won’t vanish overnight – but demand is steadily falling, and few new positions are being created.

Stable demand: Networking, database administration (especially in regulated environments), traditional Java and C++ software development, project management, enterprise architecture. These remain essential – but offer limited career growth or salary upside.

Sharply rising demand: AI engineering and MLOps; prompt engineering and LLM orchestration; cloud-native development (Kubernetes, serverless); DevSecOps and supply-chain security; FinOps and cloud cost optimization; Data Governance and data engineering; cybersecurity – with specific emphasis on NIS2 compliance and AI security. In these domains, demand vastly outstrips supply.

39 %
Skills become obsolete by 2030
109.000
Open IT positions in DE
30-50 %
Cheaper: Reskilling vs. Hiring

Sources: WEF Future of Jobs 2025, Bitkom 2025, McKinsey 2025

The Reskilling Strategy: Three Action Areas

Action Area 1: AI Literacy for All. Every employee should understand what AI can – and cannot – do, and how to use it safely. Since February 2025, the EU AI Act explicitly requires companies to ensure their staff’s AI literacy. Practically, this means short, modular training for all employees working with AI tools. Effort is modest (2-4 hours per person), but impact is substantial.

Action Area 2: Specialized Upskilling for Critical Roles. System administrators evolve into cloud engineers. Developers master AI-assisted development and prompt engineering. Security analysts expand into AI security and NIS2 compliance. Investment is higher (40-100 hours per person), yet still cheaper than hiring – and delivers the advantage of institutional knowledge and cultural alignment.

Action Area 3: Strategic Hiring for Non-Internally Developable Competencies. Certain specialists – e.g., AI researchers, quantum security experts, or high-performance computing engineers – cannot realistically be grown internally. For these roles, hiring remains unavoidable. CIOs must prioritize such hires strategically – not scattergun. Each strategic hire should also be planned as an internal multiplier: the new expert trains existing staff.

AI as a Reskilling Accelerator

Paradoxically, AI itself is the most effective tool for AI upskilling. AI copilots like GitHub Copilot, Cursor, or Amazon CodeWhisperer boost developer productivity by 20-40 percent – and simultaneously function as implicit learning aids: A junior developer working alongside an AI copilot absorbs best practices, design patterns, and new frameworks faster than through conventional training.

For CIOs, this means: Rolling out AI copilots isn’t just a productivity initiative – it’s a skill-development instrument. Companies deploying AI tools broadly are, by definition, investing in their workforce’s upskilling. The effect is measurable: Studies show teams using AI copilots learn new technologies significantly faster than those without.

What CIOs Should Do Now

The reskilling agenda is not an annual planning exercise – it’s a strategic CIO priority spanning the next three years. By Q2 2026, CIOs must conduct a skills audit across their IT organization: Which competencies exist today? Which will be needed in 12 and 24 months? Where are gaps largest? Based on this audit, they must develop a prioritized reskilling plan – with clear goals, budgets, and accountability. The executive board must know and endorse this plan: Investing in your own workforce is the only scalable, long-term response to the talent shortage.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long does an IT reskilling program take?

It depends on scope: AI literacy for all employees takes 2-4 hours. Specialized upskilling for critical roles requires 40-100 hours over 3-6 months. Initial planning and the skills audit typically take 6-8 weeks.

What does reskilling cost compared to hiring?

McKinsey estimates internal reskilling at 30-50 percent of the cost of a comparable new hire – when factoring in onboarding, turnover, and time-to-productivity. The added benefit: Reskilled staff already know the company culture and systems.

Which IT skills will be most in demand by 2030?

AI engineering and MLOps, cloud-native development, DevSecOps, FinOps, data engineering, and cybersecurity – particularly NIS2 compliance and AI security – will be the fastest-growing skill domains.

Is AI literacy useful for non-technical staff?

Yes. Since February 2025, the EU AI Act explicitly requires all employees interacting with AI systems to possess adequate knowledge. Moreover, AI literacy significantly boosts acceptance and effectiveness of AI tools across business units.

How do AI copilots support upskilling?

AI copilots don’t just lift productivity by 20-40 percent – they serve as implicit training tools. Developers absorb best practices and new frameworks faster through daily collaboration with a copilot than via traditional classroom instruction.

More from the MBF Media Network

Header Image Source: Andrea Piacquadio / Pexels

Share this article:

Also available in

More Articles

04.08.2026

Local AI: Governance Before Hardware Purchase

Benedikt Langer

10 min readFour developments over two weeks show that locally operated AI goes far beyond the tech stack. ...

Read Article
03.08.2026

AI Regulation: Up to 3 Percent of Corporate Revenue

Tobias Massow

5 min read Article 50 of the AI Act has bound providers and deployers to concrete transparency obligations ...

Read Article
31.07.2026

You are paying for the R&D of the next competitor

Benedikt Langer

4 min read You are funding the R&D of your next competitor and calling it AI transformation. Frontier ...

Read Article
29.07.2026

Model Harness Instead of Model Marriage: Who Controls the AI Chain?

Eva Mickler

6 min read The lock-in is shifting from the individual model to the orchestration layer. Those who don’t ...

Read Article
28.07.2026

Washington decides which AI is allowed to run here

Eva Mickler

6 Min. read time In just eight days, Washington has shifted the dispute over Chinese AI models from ...

Read Article
23.07.2026

Orphaned Access: The Silent Cybersecurity Gap

Benedikt Langer

5 Min. Read Time Service accounts, API keys, and AI agents often outnumber human accounts. Many of these ...

Read Article
A magazine by Evernine Media GmbH