24.03.2026
9 min read

He founded the company 38 years ago. He personally acquired every customer, resolved every crisis himself, and hired every employee. Now he sits alone in his office each evening, asking himself a question no one ever prepared him for: Who am I when I no longer have this? 545,000 entrepreneurs across Germany face precisely this question – and for the first time in the history of the KfW Succession Monitoring report, more owners plan to close their businesses than to hand them over.

TL;DR

  • 545,000 businesses are seeking successors by 2029. For the first time, planned closures (114,000 annually) outnumber successions (109,000). This marks a structural shift (KfW Succession Monitoring 2025).
  • Only 4,000 potential buyers exist for every 9,600 succession-ready businesses. The succession gap has nearly doubled since 2019 (DIHK Succession Report 2025).
  • Purchase prices have risen by 34 percent since 2019. The average price expectation stands at €499,000 – unaffordable for many internal successors.
  • 92 percent of planned closures fail not due to price, but because no successor is willing or capable.
  • Potential job losses: Over one million by 2030 if current trends continue (DIHK projection).

The Scale: More Closures Than Successions

The KfW Succession Monitoring, published in January 2026, documents a tipping point. Annually, 109,000 companies seek a succession solution – while 114,000 plan deliberate shutdowns. For the first time, the scale tilts toward closure.

The DIHK’s figures make the situation even more tangible. In 2024, chambers of commerce and industry (IHKs) conducted nearly 10,000 succession consultations – a record high and 16 percent more than the previous year. The result? Just 4,000 acquisition candidates for 9,600 succession-ready businesses. A staggering 5,620 businesses stand without a single interested party – not merely lacking the right successor, but any successor at all.

DIHK Succession Report 2025
9.600
seek successors
vs.
4.000
want to acquire

Source: DIHK Corporate Succession Report 2025 (based on nearly 10,000 IHK consultations)

Demographics explain the trend. Thirty-nine percent of business owners are over age 60 – a historic high. The average owner age is now 54, up from 45 two decades ago. Meanwhile, acquisition-driven startups have plummeted – from 203,000 in 2002 to just 45,440 in 2023. The generation that could take over is smaller, pursues different career paths, and is often unwilling to make the same sacrifices as their parents.

Who Am I Without the Business?

Discussions about generational transition usually revolve around numbers: purchase price, valuation multiples, financing structures, tax planning. What’s missing from KfW and DIHK reports is the deeper reason why 38 percent of owners delay succession planning – even though they know five to ten years’ lead time is essential.

The answer isn’t lack of information. It’s one word never uttered in advisory meetings: identity.

Psychologists call it socioemotional wealth. Owner-managed businesses aren’t just economic units – they’re founders’ life’s work. Control, reputation, daily rhythm, decision-making authority, employer status, being needed – all are bound to the enterprise. Handing over means losing not only a company, but a version of oneself.

That explains why rational arguments often fall short. The tax advisor calculates that succession is more tax-efficient than closure. The IHK consultant lays out the timeline. The lawyer outlines legal options. And the owner nods, postpones the next meeting – and keeps working. Not out of ignorance, but out of fear of what comes after.

“Succession is accelerating. At the same time, for the first time, we see a slight surplus of companies intending to shut down. This is a warning signal for the entire economy.”
KfW Research, SME Succession Monitoring 2025

For board members and supervisory board directors aged 55 and older, this isn’t an abstract issue – it affects them personally. And it affects their ecosystem: the supplier whose founder turns 65 next year; the distribution partner who’s failed to find a successor for three years; the competitor who suddenly closes, flooding the market with skilled workers.

Four Paths – and Their Realities

The DIHK documents how successions actually unfold. The distribution has shifted:

External Buyers (50 percent): For the first time, the most common succession model. Private equity firms, strategic buyers, or investors from unrelated industries. Due Diligence increasingly focuses on digital operating models and technical debt. Businesses with legacy IT systems receive systematically lower valuations. Yet transactions are faster and emotionally simpler than family succession – because they’re negotiated as business deals, not inheritances.

Family Internal Succession (33 percent): Still the preference of many owners – but reality is shifting. The next generation often holds university degrees, works for large corporations, and lives in another city. The pressure to carry on the life’s work clashes with the desire to forge one’s own path. When it works, family succession delivers the most stable outcome. When it fails, the scars extend far beyond the business itself.

Employees (20 percent): Management buy-outs (MBOs) are gaining traction. Senior managers who intimately understand operations minimize transition risks. The hurdle? Purchase prices have surged 34 percent. For a plant manager scraping together savings, the €499,000 average price represents a fundamentally different category than for a private equity fund.

Conscious Closure (27 percent): The most alarming trend. More than one in four owners sees no viable solution. Ninety-two percent of these closures fail not over price – but over the absence of a person. The DIHK projects up to 250,000 businesses may close within the next decade. These aren’t just jobs. They’re supply chains, apprenticeship positions, tax revenues, and town centers.

50 %
External buyers
33 %
Family
20 %
MBO

Source: DIHK Succession Report 2025 (distribution of successful successions)

What Buyers Scrutinize First Today

In 2026, anyone buying a company doesn’t look first at the balance sheet. They look at the IT.

During Due Diligence, digital infrastructure is systematically assessed: ERP maturity, automation level, IT security posture, data strategy. Missing maintenance contracts, outdated software, and unclear rights to in-house-developed solutions are red flags – driving down purchase prices or triggering renegotiation. The KfW Digitalization Report 2024 shows most SMEs remain at the very beginning of their digital journey. In succession contexts, that directly depresses sale value.

What buyers often encounter is sobering: A managing director who holds all customer contacts in his head. An ERP system from 2011. No documented processes – because “we know how it runs.” Knowledge monopolies instead of knowledge systems. For a successor, this means: You’re not just buying a company – you’re buying its technical debt.

The implication for executives planning succession? Investing in a digital operating model during the three years before sale shortens transaction timelines and strengthens negotiating leverage – not because digitalization magically lifts price, but because it signals to buyers: This company functions even without its founder.

The Supply Chain Dimension: Why This Is Your Problem Too

Generational transition isn’t just the challenge facing the 545,000 owners seeking successors. It’s the problem of every company relying on SME suppliers, service providers, or distribution partners.

The DIHK Report’s sector breakdown reveals where bottlenecks loom largest: In gastronomy and hospitality, there are 3.5 succession-ready businesses per interested buyer. In logistics, the ratio is 4:1. In retail, one in four succession-bound businesses puts its future up for grabs. Sixty-three percent of affected businesses also grapple with skilled labor shortages. Attempting succession under such conditions is like building a house in a storm.

For executive leadership, this means: One in four suppliers or vendors could vanish within the next three years – not through insolvency or market failure, but because a 63-year-old managing director finds no successor and simply locks the door. Companies failing to screen their supply chains for succession risk will be blindsided by a wave that’s been gathering for years.

What Executives Must Do Now

1. Treat succession planning as a strategic priority. Not as an HR topic, not as retirement planning – but as a strategic initiative with its own timeline. The DIHK recommends five to ten years’ lead time. Yet 38 percent of owners begin only one to two years ahead. That’s too late.

2. Talk openly about letting go. The emotional dimension isn’t soft padding – it’s the most frequent cause of delays. Executives and supervisory board members must proactively initiate conversations about identity, control, and life after succession – not at the notary’s office, but long before.

3. Define digital maturity as a prerequisite for succession. Every process residing solely in one person’s head erodes enterprise value. A documented, data-driven business appeals to all successor types – and continues functioning even after the founder departs.

4. Screen supply chains for succession risk. Which key suppliers are owner-managed? Who’s over 60? Systematic screening identifies risks before they become bottlenecks.

5. View generational transition as an acquisition opportunity. With 545,000 companies seeking successors, conglomerates and larger SMEs face a major M&A opportunity – strategic acquisitions at terms unimaginable five years ago.

Conclusion: Life’s Work Needs a Plan

545,000 companies. Each one the life’s work of a person who arrived first each morning and left last each evening – who knows employees by their first names and values a handshake more than a contract.

These companies aren’t vanishing because they’re unprofitable. They’re disappearing because no one steps up. Because the successor generation is smaller, purchase prices have soared, and letting go proves harder than any restructuring an executive has ever overseen.

The DIHK projects over one million lost jobs by 2030 – and 250,000 closed businesses within ten years. These aren’t abstract figures. They’re town centers left vacant. Supply chains severed. Knowledge walking out the door with the founder.

To prevent this, two things are essential: Start earlier – and speak more honestly. About numbers, yes. But also about the question posed at the start of this article: Who am I when I no longer have this? The answer determines whether 545,000 life’s works will have a future.

Frequently Asked Questions

How large is the succession gap in Germany?

According to the DIHK Succession Report 2025, 9,600 succession-ready businesses face just 4,000 acquisition candidates. 5,620 businesses have zero interested parties. The gap has nearly doubled since 2019.

Why do so many companies plan closure instead of succession?

Ninety-two percent of planned closures fail not over price, but due to the absence of a successor. The successor generation is numerically smaller, pursues alternative career paths, and is often unwilling to assume ownership of SMEs. Compounding this: Many owners delay planning because emotional resistance makes letting go difficult.

How far in advance should succession be prepared?

The DIHK recommends five to ten years’ lead time. Onboarding a successor alone takes 12-24 months. Yet 38 percent of owners begin only one to two years ahead – leading to time pressure, worse terms, and frequent failure.

What does a mid-sized company cost?

Per KfW, the average sale price is €499,000. Prices have risen 34 percent nominally since 2019 (9.5 percent inflation-adjusted). The range varies widely depending on sector, size, and digital maturity.

What role does IT play in succession?

Buyers assess IT infrastructure as part of Due Diligence. Modern ERP systems, documented processes, and cloud infrastructure increase attractiveness for successors. Legacy IT, person-dependent knowledge monopolies, and poor documentation kill purchase prices. Digital transformation before succession isn’t optional – it’s mandatory.

What does generational transition mean for large corporations?

Three implications: Screen supply chains for succession risk (one in four suppliers could disappear). Leverage generational transition as an M&A opportunity (545,000 potential acquisition targets). Professionalize internal succession planning – not just for top leadership, but for critical management roles.

Further Reading

The Digital Operating Model: Why CIOs Must Restructure Their IT Organizations

Digital Due Diligence: Why M&A Deals Fail on IT

CEO Burnout: Why Executive Mental Health Has Become a Corporate Risk

More from the MBF Media Network

MyBusinessFuture: Reboot Germany – €735 Billion, Three SMEs, and the Question of Whether the Crisis Is Really That Bad

MyBusinessFuture: Skilled Labor Turnaround – Five Strategies That Actually Work

SecurityToday: The NIS2 Audit – How Companies Prepare

Header Image Source: Pexels / George Morina (px:6918529)

Share this article:

Also available in

More Articles

04.08.2026

Local AI: Governance Before Hardware Purchase

Benedikt Langer

10 min readFour developments over two weeks show that locally operated AI goes far beyond the tech stack. ...

Read Article
03.08.2026

AI Regulation: Up to 3 Percent of Corporate Revenue

Tobias Massow

5 min read Article 50 of the AI Act has bound providers and deployers to concrete transparency obligations ...

Read Article
31.07.2026

You are paying for the R&D of the next competitor

Benedikt Langer

4 min read You are funding the R&D of your next competitor and calling it AI transformation. Frontier ...

Read Article
29.07.2026

Model Harness Instead of Model Marriage: Who Controls the AI Chain?

Eva Mickler

6 min read The lock-in is shifting from the individual model to the orchestration layer. Those who don’t ...

Read Article
28.07.2026

Washington decides which AI is allowed to run here

Eva Mickler

6 Min. read time In just eight days, Washington has shifted the dispute over Chinese AI models from ...

Read Article
23.07.2026

Orphaned Access: The Silent Cybersecurity Gap

Benedikt Langer

5 Min. Read Time Service accounts, API keys, and AI agents often outnumber human accounts. Many of these ...

Read Article
A magazine by Evernine Media GmbH