27.01.2026

7 min Reading Time

Continental is splitting into three independent entities. BASF has sold its coatings business to Carlyle for €7.7 billion. ThyssenKrupp has taken its marine subsidiary public – and plans further spin-offs. ADNOC acquired Covestro for €14.7 billion. Germany’s M&A market isn’t seeing a revival in 2026 – it’s undergoing a structural revolution. $1.3 trillion in private equity “dry powder” is pressing on the market. Carve-outs are replacing traditional acquisitions. And the question at board level is no longer “buy or sell?” but “which parts of our company do we actually still own?”

TL;DR

  • 800 domestic transactions expected in 2026: 13% more deals and 11% higher deal values versus 2025. The mid-market segment is growing by 20% (KPMG / Lincoln International).
  • $1.3 trillion global PE dry powder: 40% of it older than two years (a record). PE funds face mounting exit pressure – and must deploy capital (Bain PE Report 2026).
  • 57% of corporates are actively pursuing carve-outs: 71% of PE firms are open to acquiring them. Portfolio rationalization has become the dominant M&A pattern (KPMG Survey).
  • BASF/Carlyle as the model deal: €7.7 billion for BASF Coatings, with BASF retaining a 40% stake. The model: spin off without fully letting go.
  • German mid-market multiple: 5.7x EBITDA: while global buyout multiples stand at a record 11.8x. This valuation gap makes German targets highly attractive to international buyers.

The Great Unbundling: A New M&A Paradigm

What Continental has been doing since 2024 is more than restructuring – it’s a masterclass in next-generation portfolio management. The group has split into three distinct units: Aumovio (Automotive) listed independently on the stock exchange in September 2025; ContiTech OESL was sold to Regent in February 2026; and a structured sales process for the remaining ContiTech business launched in January 2026. Special items alone totaled €1.718 billion in 2025: €248 million for restructuring, €503 million for impairments, €91 million for carve-out costs, and €681 million for divestiture expenses.

This is no emergency operation. It’s a strategic decision: A diversified conglomerate no longer works when its individual units face divergent capital requirements, market cycles, and growth rates. The sum of the parts is worth more than the whole – but only if those parts can operate autonomously.

ThyssenKrupp is following the same playbook: Its marine subsidiary TKMS went public in October 2025, with ThyssenKrupp retaining a 51% stake. A performance review for the Materials Services division is scheduled for end-March 2026 – a potential spin-off with an IPO this autumn remains an option, though not yet decided. The steel division – the former heart of the group – continues searching for a solution; the proposed sale to Jindal Steel is increasingly uncertain.

BASF has chosen perhaps the most elegant path: Its coatings business (€3.8 billion in revenue) is being acquired by Carlyle and the Qatar Investment Authority for €7.7 billion. Yet BASF retains a 40% stake. The model: carve out without fully relinquishing control. The €5.8 billion in cash proceeds strengthens the balance sheet, while the 40% stake preserves influence – and participation in future growth.

7,7 Mrd. EUR
BASF Coatings: Enterprise Value in the Carlyle/QIA deal
Source: BASF press release, October 2025

$1.3 Trillion Seeking a Target

The PE market is the driving force behind the 2026 M&A wave. According to the Bain Global Private Equity Report, buyout funds hold approximately $1.3 trillion in dry powder – uninvested capital that must be deployed. 40% of that amount is older than two years (a record), and 24% is even older than four years. Limited Partners (LPs) – the investors who provided the capital – are demanding returns.

This pressure acts in two directions: PE funds must invest (in new deals) and simultaneously execute exits (selling existing holdings). The investment-to-exit ratio improved to 2:1 in 2025, up from nearly 3:1 in prior years. Yet the backlog of pending exits remains enormous.

For German boards, this means three things: First, PE funds are knocking more frequently at the door with acquisition offers for corporate divisions. According to KPMG, 55% of PE dealmakers are considering buying carved-out assets. Second, German companies held by PE firms (STADA, Otto Bock, Springer) face ownership changes – creating both strategic opportunities and risks. Third, valuations are becoming more ambitious: The global median buyout multiple stands at 11.8x EBITDA – an all-time high.

Within Germany itself, the BVK (Federal Association of Capital Companies) recorded €15.69 billion in PE/VC investments for 2025 – a 4% increase and the highest level since 2021. PE’s share of German M&A transactions stands at around 48% in 2026. In nearly every second deal, a financial investor is involved on at least one side.

Carve-outs: The Dominant M&A Pattern in 2026

According to a KPMG survey, 57% of corporates are actively pursuing portfolio rationalization and carve-outs. 71% of PE firms are open to acquiring carve-outs. 51% of corporates expect rising carve-out activity over the next 12 to 24 months.

Why is this trend peaking now? Three drivers converge. First: Post-COVID clarity. The pandemic revealed which business units are resilient under stress – and which are not. Boards that hesitated between 2021 and 2022 are now acting decisively. Second: The AI imperative. Companies investing in AI need capital. Carve-outs generate cash from business units outside the AI core. Third: PE pressure. Financial investors specifically seek such units – profitable, operationally autonomous, and with a clear value proposition.

The biggest challenges, per KPMG: operational disentanglement (52%), valuation complexity (43%), and IT/data separation (40%). The last point hits CIOs especially hard: When two business units have shared the same SAP system for two decades, separation becomes a multi-month, multi-million-euro project. Without a plan, you fail due diligence.

57 %
of corporates are actively pursuing carve-outs and portfolio rationalization
Source: KPMG Global Dealmaker Survey, 2026

The Valuation Gap: Why German Targets Are Gaining Appeal

The valuation landscape reveals a widening chasm. German mid-market companies trade, on average, at 5.7x EBITDA. Global buyout multiples have hit an all-time high of 11.8x. For international buyers, German targets thus represent relative value: profitable, well-run, and modestly priced by international standards.

A succession crisis amplifies the effect: According to KfW, 569,000 mid-sized German firms plan to shut down operations by 2029. For the first time, the number of owners intending to close their businesses now exceeds those seeking successors. For strategic buyers and PE funds, this is a buyer’s market – more qualified targets available than buyers competing for them.

The convergence of succession pressure, PE dry powder, and the urgent need for digital capabilities makes 2026 the most active year for German M&A since 2021.

Dr. Michael Drill, CEO Lincoln International Germany (paraphrased)

Dr. Michael Drill, CEO of Lincoln International Germany, forecasts 20% growth in the mid-market segment compared to 2025.

Build vs. Buy: How AI Is Reshaping the Calculus

The traditional build-vs-buy decision is shifting decisively toward “buy” in 2026. Why? Building AI capabilities internally takes years. Recruiting a team of ML engineers, data scientists, and MLOps specialists costs at least €500,000 annually in Germany – and qualified talent is scarce. Acquiring a specialized AI startup – or a data provider – can deliver equivalent capability in three months instead of three years.

McKinsey outlines a new “AI M&A Playbook”: In tech M&A this year, scale economies matter less than access to talent, proprietary data, and model IP. Alternative structures are gaining traction: minority stakes, ecosystem partnerships, and acqui-hires (acquiring a company primarily for its people) allow firms to acquire AI capabilities without executing a full-blown M&A transaction.

For boards, this means: M&A strategy must expand to include digital acquisition targets. Not just “Which company fits our product portfolio?” but also “Which data assets, algorithms, and teams are missing from our stack?”

The Counterpoint: Why So Many Deals Fail

According to industry estimates, a large share of M&A transactions miss their original value-creation goals. The most common reasons: cultural misfit (key employees resign post-close), IT integration failure (systems simply won’t talk to each other), and overpayment (the buyer paid too much). With carve-outs, an additional risk emerges: disentanglement failure – if the spun-off unit cannot operate independently, its value erodes faster than due diligence predicted.

Continental learned this the hard way: €1.718 billion in special items in one year illustrates the cost of a triple-split. BASF Coatings must now prove it can innovate just as effectively outside the BASF ecosystem. And ThyssenKrupp Steel remains without a viable solution after the Jindal deal stalled.

The lesson for boards: A carve-out is not a project – it’s a corporate start-up. Underestimate its complexity, and you pay twice: once for the transaction, and again for remediation.

What Boards Should Do in 2026

1. Force a portfolio review. Every business unit must answer: “Are we the best owner of this unit?” If a PE fund could run it better – delivering sharper focus, greater investment readiness, and more operational freedom – then selling isn’t a failure. It’s strategy.

2. Assess IT separability. 40% of carve-out challenges are IT-driven. CIOs should evaluate “carve-out readiness” for every business unit: How long would SAP separation take? Which shared services would need replication? What’s the cost of a standalone IT stack?

3. Build an AI M&A pipeline. If you’ll need AI capabilities in two years, you must be screening targets today. That demands a new scouting process – one that evaluates not just revenue and EBITDA, but data assets, team quality, and technological differentiation.

4. Proactively engage with PE. Whether as buyer (of PE-owned targets), seller (of carve-out candidates), or partner (via minority stakes): Boards that view PE funds solely as hostile bidders miss strategic opportunities. PE investors are involved in 48% of all German M&A deals. They’re not a fringe phenomenon – they’re mainstream.

Conclusion

Germany’s M&A market is undergoing a structural revolution in 2026. Continental, BASF, and ThyssenKrupp show that the future belongs to focused enterprises – not conglomerates. $1.3 trillion in PE dry powder is accelerating the transformation. Carve-outs have replaced traditional acquisitions as the dominant M&A pattern. And the valuation gap between German mid-market firms (5.7x) and global buyouts (11.8x) makes German targets internationally attractive. For boards, this is a unique opportunity: Cleaning up your portfolio now finances your reboot through internal strength.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a carve-out – and why is it the dominant M&A pattern?

A carve-out is the separation of a business unit from a parent company – either via sale to a new owner or as a spin-off to the stock exchange. It dominates in 2026 because corporates seek portfolio focus (AI demands capital), PE funds specifically target such operationally independent units, and valuations for focused companies exceed those for diversified conglomerates.

Why are German mid-market firms valued so low – at just 5.7x EBITDA?

This multiple reflects risk: owner dependency, limited scalability, and often a lack of dedicated IT infrastructure. Globally, professionally managed buyout targets trade at 11.8x. The gap makes German SMEs attractive to PE funds that see professionalization itself as a primary value driver.

How long does a typical carve-out take?

12 to 24 months – from decision to closing. IT separation alone often takes 6 to 12 months. Continental required over two years (2024-2026) for its three-way split – and recorded €1.7 billion in special items. Underestimating timeline complexity is the most frequent error.

Should our company buy – or sell?

The answer depends on portfolio strategy. Buy – if critical digital capabilities can’t be built internally fast enough. Sell – if a business unit would grow more strongly under different ownership. The BASF model (sell, but retain 40%) shows the choice need not be binary.

What does the PE exit backlog mean for corporates?

PE funds under pressure to exit holdings create opportunities for strategic buyers. STADA (€10 billion, sold by Bain/Cinven to CapVest) is one example. Corporates that proactively screen PE exit targets gain access to well-professionalized businesses at rational valuations.

Further Reading

CIO Reboot: €245 Billion – and Where the Money Is Going (Digital Chiefs)

Board Governance: Digital Competence in the Supervisory Board (Digital Chiefs)

Mid-Market M&A: Why 2026 Is the Decisive Year (MyBusinessFuture)

Reboot Germany: €735 Billion in Investments (MyBusinessFuture)

Header Image Source: Pexels / Startup Stock Photos (px:7376)

Share this article:

Also available in

More Articles

05.06.2026

Managed Security Services: CISO Does Not Bear Sole Liability

Benedikt Langer

8 min. read In many organisations, the CISO is seen as the person who stands accountable for security. ...

Read Article
04.06.2026

Technical Debt: Why the Board Must Act Now

Eva Mickler

7 min. read Technical debt appears in no balance sheet, yet it costs every large enterprise real money. ...

Read Article
03.06.2026

Data Spaces: Where Smart Industry and Smart City Converge

Eva Mickler

8 min read For years, industrial and urban data were seen as two separate worlds: here the factory with ...

Read Article
03.06.2026

Zero Trust Requires Process Knowledge, Not Just Tools

Benedikt Langer

8 min read Zero Trust is plastered on every security slide deck, yet implementation rarely fails because ...

Read Article
02.06.2026

Digitalization Without a Big Bang: A Step-by-Step Transformation

Eva Mickler

8 Min. read time The grand digital leap often follows a predictable trajectory: a multi-year program, ...

Read Article
01.06.2026

Learning on the Job: What the Board of Directors Needs to Demand when 89% of the AI Strategy is

Benedikt Langer

6 Min. read time 89 percent of companies say they’re steering their AI strategy in "learning as we ...

Read Article
A magazine by Evernine Media GmbH